🎯 Prioritization Techniques: Choosing What Matters Most
Imagine you have a box of toys, but you can only carry a few to the park. How do you pick which ones? That’s prioritization!
🍕 The Pizza Party Problem
Picture this: You’re planning a pizza party with limited money. You want pepperoni, extra cheese, garlic bread, drinks, and a fancy dessert. But your budget says you can’t have everything!
What do you do?
You prioritize—decide what’s most important, what’s nice to have, and what you can skip.
In Agile, teams face this exact problem every sprint. They have:
- Lots of ideas from stakeholders
- Limited time
- Limited people
So they use prioritization techniques to pick the best work to do first.
🏰 The Four Magical Tools
Think of these techniques as four different sorting machines. Each one helps you organize your work in a different way!
graph TD A["📋 Too Many Tasks!"] --> B{Which Tool?} B --> C["🎯 MoSCoW"] B --> D["⚡ WSJF"] B --> E["⚖️ Value vs Effort"] B --> F["🚨 Risk-Based"] C --> G["Sorted by Importance"] D --> G E --> G F --> G
🎯 MoSCoW Method
What Is It?
MoSCoW is a funny-looking word that helps you sort tasks into four buckets.
| Letter | Means | Think of it as… |
|---|---|---|
| M | Must Have | 🔴 Can’t live without it! |
| S | Should Have | 🟠 Really important, but okay if delayed |
| C | Could Have | 🟡 Nice bonus if we have time |
| W | Won’t Have | ⚪ Not this time |
(The 'o’s just make it easier to say!)
🎂 Birthday Party Example
You’re planning your birthday party:
| Category | Items |
|---|---|
| Must Have | Birthday cake, invitations, venue |
| Should Have | Decorations, party games |
| Could Have | Photo booth, party favors |
| Won’t Have | Hiring a magician (too expensive!) |
Without cake, is it really a birthday party? No! That’s why cake is a “Must Have.”
🖥️ Real Software Example
Building a login page:
| Priority | Feature |
|---|---|
| Must | Username/password fields, login button |
| Should | “Forgot password” link |
| Could | “Remember me” checkbox |
| Won’t | Fingerprint login (next version) |
⚡ Quick Rule
Must = The product breaks without it Should = Users will be unhappy without it Could = Users would smile with it Won’t = Park it for later
⚡ WSJF: Weighted Shortest Job First
What Is It?
WSJF is like a magic calculator that figures out which task gives you the most value for the least effort.
🍪 The Cookie Story
Imagine you sell cookies. You have three customers:
| Customer | Cookies Ordered | Baking Time |
|---|---|---|
| Anna | 2 cookies | 5 minutes |
| Bob | 10 cookies | 30 minutes |
| Carla | 1 cookie | 2 minutes |
Who do you serve first?
If you serve Carla first (2 minutes for $1), then Anna (5 minutes for $2), you make happy customers faster!
📊 The WSJF Formula
WSJF = Cost of Delay ÷ Job Size
Cost of Delay = How much value we lose by waiting Job Size = How long the work takes
graph TD A["Calculate WSJF"] --> B["Cost of Delay"] A --> C["Job Size"] B --> D["User Value"] B --> E["Time Criticality"] B --> F["Risk Reduction"] D --> G["Add Them Up"] E --> G F --> G G --> H["Divide by Job Size"] H --> I["WSJF Score!"]
🎮 Game Example
| Feature | Value | Time Critical | Risk | Job Size | WSJF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fix crash bug | 8 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 12 ⭐ |
| Add dark mode | 5 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 |
| New character | 6 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 1.4 |
Winner: Fix the crash bug first! Highest WSJF score.
💡 Why It Works
WSJF says: “Do small, valuable things first. They stack up fast!”
⚖️ Value vs Effort Matrix
What Is It?
A simple 2x2 grid that helps you see which tasks are “quick wins” and which are “time traps.”
graph TD subgraph High Value A["🎯 Quick Wins<br>Do First!"] B["🏆 Big Projects<br>Plan Carefully"] end subgraph Low Value C["🗑️ Time Wasters<br>Avoid!"] D["🍬 Fill-Ins<br>Maybe Later"] end
📍 The Four Quadrants
| Low Effort | High Effort | |
|---|---|---|
| High Value | 🎯 Quick Wins — Do these NOW! | 🏆 Major Projects — Worth the investment |
| Low Value | 🍬 Fill-ins — Only if you have spare time | 🗑️ Time Wasters — Don’t bother! |
🏠 Cleaning Your Room Example
| Task | Value | Effort | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|
| Make bed | High (looks neat) | Low | 🎯 Quick Win |
| Organize closet | High (find clothes) | High | 🏆 Major Project |
| Dust lamp shade | Low | Low | 🍬 Fill-in |
| Rearrange all furniture | Low | High | 🗑️ Time Waster |
Start with: Make the bed! Quick win.
🔧 Software Example
| Feature | Value | Effort | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Add loading spinner | High | Low | 🎯 Do it now! |
| Redesign entire UI | High | High | 🏆 Plan it well |
| Change button color | Low | Low | 🍬 Maybe later |
| Build custom animation library | Low | High | 🗑️ Skip it |
⭐ Golden Rule
Always hunt for Quick Wins first. They build momentum and make everyone happy!
🚨 Risk-Based Prioritization
What Is It?
Some tasks are ticking time bombs. If you don’t handle them, they can explode and ruin everything!
Risk-based prioritization means: Find the scary stuff and deal with it first.
🌧️ The Umbrella Story
You’re going on a trip. The weather forecast says:
- 90% chance of rain on Day 1
- 10% chance of rain on Day 2
Do you pack your umbrella for Day 1 or Day 2?
Day 1! The risk is higher.
🎲 Understanding Risk
Risk = Probability × Impact
| Risk Factor | Question to Ask |
|---|---|
| Probability | How likely is this to go wrong? |
| Impact | If it goes wrong, how bad is it? |
📊 Risk Matrix
| Low Impact | High Impact | |
|---|---|---|
| High Probability | 🟡 Moderate Risk | 🔴 Critical! Do First |
| Low Probability | 🟢 Low Risk | 🟠 Watch Carefully |
🏗️ Building an App Example
| Risk | Probability | Impact | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| Payment system fails | Medium | High | 🔴 Address first |
| Database can’t scale | Low | High | 🟠 Plan early |
| Button color is ugly | High | Low | 🟡 Fix when possible |
| Typo in settings | Low | Low | 🟢 Whenever |
🛡️ When to Use Risk-Based Prioritization
Use it when:
- Building something new and uncertain
- Working with third-party services (they might break!)
- Having security concerns
- Facing tight deadlines (no room for surprises)
💡 Key Insight
The best teams don’t wait for problems. They hunt for risks and squash them early!
🎪 Putting It All Together
When to Use Each Technique
| Situation | Best Technique |
|---|---|
| Stakeholders arguing about what’s important | 🎯 MoSCoW |
| Many tasks, need to maximize value delivery | ⚡ WSJF |
| Quick visual way to spot priorities | ⚖️ Value vs Effort |
| Project has unknowns or scary parts | 🚨 Risk-Based |
🎭 They Work Together!
Many teams combine techniques:
- Use MoSCoW to filter out the “Won’t Haves”
- Apply Risk-Based thinking to the “Must Haves”
- Use Value vs Effort for the “Should/Could Haves”
- Calculate WSJF for the final sprint order
graph TD A["All Ideas"] --> B["MoSCoW Filter"] B --> C["Must + Should + Could"] C --> D["Risk Check"] D --> E["Value vs Effort Grid"] E --> F["WSJF Calculation"] F --> G["📋 Sprint Backlog"]
✨ You Did It!
You now know four powerful ways to decide what to work on first:
| Technique | Superpower |
|---|---|
| 🎯 MoSCoW | Sort by importance buckets |
| ⚡ WSJF | Calculate value per effort |
| ⚖️ Value vs Effort | Visual quick-win finder |
| 🚨 Risk-Based | Hunt and fix dangers early |
“The art of prioritization is not about doing more—it’s about doing what matters.”
Go forth and prioritize like a pro! 🚀
